Skip to content

Conversation

@lferrigno
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Operators need to know hardware requirements

Description

Add simple hardware requirements section on the documentation

@github-actions github-actions bot added the L1 Ethereum client label Oct 23, 2025
@lferrigno
Copy link
Contributor Author

We need to add separately hardware requirements for L2

@lferrigno lferrigno marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2025 18:36
@lferrigno lferrigno requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2025 18:36
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 30, 2025 18:36
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@lferrigno lferrigno enabled auto-merge October 30, 2025 18:36
@ethrex-project-sync ethrex-project-sync bot moved this to In Review in ethrex_l1 Oct 30, 2025
- **RAM:** Sufficient memory minimizes sync bottlenecks and improves stability under load.
- **CPU:**
- 4–8 cores for standard nodes
- 8–16 cores for heavy or archival workloads
Copy link
Collaborator

@mpaulucci mpaulucci Oct 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dunno if I would mention archive since we don't support it (yet)

@lferrigno lferrigno added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 14, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8532410 Nov 14, 2025
38 of 41 checks passed
@lferrigno lferrigno deleted the docs/hardware_requirements branch November 14, 2025 16:01
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in ethrex_l1 Nov 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

L1 Ethereum client

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants